![]() ![]() If there is no advantage in this over doing it with one of the 3D file formats we already have available - I will lose interest real fast. I would also like to get things modeled with ArchiCAD into Rhino to enhance the quality of what I can model with ArchiCAD. I would like to have in this is the ability to get things modeled in Rhino into ArchiCAD that are better elements than what I can model in ArchiCAD. Unless I am not understanding what this is. Does that look like something you want to do ? This is programmer candy, not modeling tools. I would like it if someone can cut to the chase about this bidirectional connection between ArchiCAD and Rhino is so I don't have to take the time to figure it out myself.Īttached is a picture of come Grasshopper graphic representation of the codes to be applied to various elements. gsm files ? That is relatively unimportant unless it can do something better than we could already do this with a. What is the this noting more than an add-on that lets you save an ArchiCAD file as. What exactly do you mean by bidirectional? That could mean simply having a file format that both programs can convert to something they can process. Not something that seems very useful to an ArchiCAD users. gdl style code scripting tools with a few graphics to help keep track of the codes being applied to various elements. I still have no idea how Grasshopper would be useful to ArchiCAD users. I have been playing with it for a while, watched some videos, etc. 3dm add-on for ArchiCAD, Maxwell for Rhino. ? Using base molding for a test, I can get smoother curves with a. I have been testing this add-on and it seems to me that I can get much smoother results, however, I am not sure this is from the add-on or just tapping into what ArchiCAD can already do. I am always looking for ways to make curves and surfaces smoother in ArchiCAD.ĭoes this add-on for Rhino actually give us smoother curves and smoother rounded surfaces in ArchiCAD that we can get with out it ? 3dm files directly, and I do like the option for controlling the poly count. skp, etc.Īnd ArchiCAD can already export 3d files that can be opened/imported into Rhino.Īll I can see as being anything new is that we can open. However, unless the imported object has smoother curves and surfaces than we can make in ArchiCAD with out it, what is the advantage? Rhino already generates a number of 3d file formats that we an import into ArchiCAD.3ds. gsm, and in doing so you can control the poly count to make it as smooth as you can. How is it smart? As near as I can tell, the ArchiCAD add-on will convert a. Redraw scene when viewports are exposed: OnĪpple Inc.: Apple Internal Keyboard / TrackpadĪpple Inc.Just wanted to congratulate GS for a supersmart move!!! Hoping we can find a way to stick on Mac as its great for everything else we do! But I am not so computer literate so the ‘CPU, GPU’ jargon above is a little hard for me to understand!Īny help much appreciated. My macbook pro is fairly new and I thought fairly powerful. My question is whether my machine is just not powerful enough (we might upgrade to more punchy I macs) or whether the functionality just isn’t there yet. Rhino 7 seems to work great APART from the the render speeds I am currently experiencing which seem extremely slow. ![]() Im testing Rhino 7 and crucially need to be able to make simple render outputs to take shadow layers for use in collage style architectural renders. ![]() I’ve been using Rhino on windows for some time but I am now looking in to a switch onto mac to improve workflow between myself and my small team. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |